28 active · 0 acknowledged
Alerts
Model confidence
94%
Probable cause
Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Evidence
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
Model confidence
93%
Probable cause
Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
Evidence
- — Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Discharge temperature excursions during peak ambient (48°C)
Model confidence
91%
Probable cause
Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Evidence
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
Model confidence
92%
Probable cause
Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
Evidence
- — Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
- — Refrigerant suction pressure drift
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
Model confidence
90%
Probable cause
Discharge temperature 18% above baseline during 12:00–16:00 peak (ambient 47°C)
Evidence
- — Discharge temperature 18% above baseline during 12:00–16:00 peak (ambient 47°C)
- — Bearing vibration RMS rose from 2.1 to 6.4 mm/s over 21 days
- — Intake filter ΔP at 480 Pa — sand ingress after 3 shamal events
Model confidence
88%
Probable cause
Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Evidence
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
Model confidence
88%
Probable cause
Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
Evidence
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
Model confidence
87%
Probable cause
Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
Evidence
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Refrigerant suction pressure drift
Model confidence
86%
Probable cause
Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Evidence
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
Model confidence
85%
Probable cause
Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
Evidence
- — Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
Model confidence
83%
Probable cause
Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
Evidence
- — Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
Model confidence
81%
Probable cause
Insulation resistance degradation detected
Evidence
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
- — Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
Model confidence
78%
Probable cause
Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
Evidence
- — Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
- — Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Model confidence
76%
Probable cause
Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
Evidence
- — Bearing vibration trending +38% over 14 days
- — Refrigerant suction pressure drift
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Model confidence
75%
Probable cause
Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
Evidence
- — Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Model confidence
74%
Probable cause
Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
Evidence
- — Thermal cycling stress from daily ΔT of 22°C
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
Model confidence
74%
Probable cause
Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
Evidence
- — Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Model confidence
70%
Probable cause
Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Evidence
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
- — Oil analysis: elevated iron particulates (42 ppm)
- — Discharge temperature excursions during peak ambient (48°C)
Model confidence
70%
Probable cause
Insulation resistance degradation detected
Evidence
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
- — Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
- — Discharge temperature excursions during peak ambient (48°C)
Model confidence
68%
Probable cause
Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
Evidence
- — Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Model confidence
68%
Probable cause
Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
Evidence
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Discharge temperature excursions during peak ambient (48°C)
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
Model confidence
66%
Probable cause
Refrigerant suction pressure drift
Evidence
- — Refrigerant suction pressure drift
- — Motor current imbalance 6.8% across phases
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
Model confidence
67%
Probable cause
Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
Evidence
- — Chloride deposition on coil fins — coastal salinity exposure
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
Model confidence
66%
Probable cause
Insulation resistance degradation detected
Evidence
- — Insulation resistance degradation detected
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
Model confidence
62%
Probable cause
Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
Evidence
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
- — Airborne particulate loading on intake filters (PM10 > 410 µg/m³)
- — Discharge temperature excursions during peak ambient (48°C)
Model confidence
62%
Probable cause
Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
Evidence
- — Condenser approach temperature exceeding design by 4.2°C
- — Fan blade erosion from sand ingress
- — Seal leakage signature in acoustic profile